Phase 1 is executed under a structured Fixed-Price Turnkey (LSTK) EPC model, designed to minimize execution risk, protect capital discipline, and meet institutional-grade performance standards.
The engineering strategy prioritizes:
Single-point responsibility
Defined performance guarantees
Modular replication capability
Segregated storage architecture
Identity-preserved campaign milling
Integrated legume processing add-on
Independent technical oversight
The objective is not only facility construction, but delivery of a replicable infrastructure template suitable for province-by-province deployment.
Riela is designated as the lead EPC integrator responsible for:
Storage system engineering
Cleaning and handling systems
Process integration
Electrical & PLC automation
System commissioning
Performance testing
Riela acts as the primary contract counterparty under the Fixed-Price Turnkey structure.
Satake is nominated as the milling technology provider responsible for:
Rice milling line (30–40 tons/day)
Pre-cleaning and grading systems
Whitening and polishing modules
Broken rice control and separation
Yield optimization configuration
Satake operates under Riela’s integration oversight, ensuring unified system responsibility.
In addition to rice infrastructure, Cluster #1 integrates a dedicated Legume Processing Add-On System, designed to process organic mung bean (primary) and other drought-resilient legumes.
The Legume Integration System includes:
Intake and grading platform
Cleaning and separation equipment
Small-scale drying support
Bagging and dispatch system
Lot-based traceability coding
This system is asset-light and designed to:
Utilize shared infrastructure where possible
Avoid duplication of heavy capital equipment
Preserve identity segregation
Support rotational cropping model
The legume system is fully integrated within the EPC master design.
Cluster (Module) #1 is delivered under a Lump-Sum Turnkey (LSTK) structure governed by FIDIC principles.
Key contract features include:
Fixed total contract price
Defined scope of supply
Milestone-based payment schedule
Performance guarantees
Liquidated damages (where applicable)
Defects liability period
Commissioning responsibility
The EPC contractor assumes single-point responsibility for delivering a fully operational facility meeting defined technical specifications.
This model reduces cost overrun risk and ensures alignment with institutional capital expectations.
The Scope of Supply clearly defines responsibilities between the EPC contractor, milling technology supplier, and owner.
Detailed engineering and layout design
Paddy storage silos
Milled rice storage silos
Quarantine bins
Cleaning and conveying systems
Material handling equipment
Electrical systems
PLC automation and integration
Civil coordination support
Commissioning and performance testing
Legume processing line integration
Rice milling machinery
Pre-cleaners and graders
Whitening and polishing units
Broken rice separators
Yield calibration systems
Spare parts package
Technical supervision during installation
Land acquisition and permitting
Site preparation
Local utilities connection
Regulatory compliance
Organic certification coordination
Operational staffing
Working capital provisioning
Performance guarantees are a core component of the EPC structure.
The following parameters are contractually defined:
30–40 tons/day milling throughput
Defined operational hours
Legume cleaning throughput benchmarks
Defined head rice recovery rate
Controlled broken percentage thresholds
Milling efficiency benchmarks
Cleaning efficiency
Foreign matter removal rates
Moisture compliance parameters
Structural integrity of silos
Moisture control compliance
Aeration system functionality
Segregation integrity
Cleaning efficiency rate
Acceptable impurity threshold
Throughput stability
Loss percentage control
All guarantees are validated during commissioning and performance testing.
Failure to meet guaranteed parameters triggers defined contractual remedies.
To ensure institutional transparency and protect investor capital, Jasminex appoints an independent technical advisor (Owner’s Engineer).
The Owner’s Engineer is responsible for:
Reviewing detailed engineering design
Verifying equipment specifications
Monitoring construction progress
Validating milestone completion
Supervising commissioning
Confirming performance guarantee compliance
Reviewing change orders
Ensuring quality assurance documentation
The Owner’s Engineer establishes formal QA gates at:
Engineering approval stage
Civil completion stage
Mechanical installation completion
Electrical and PLC integration
Cold commissioning
Hot commissioning
Performance testing
Provisional acceptance
Final acceptance
This layered oversight structure strengthens DFI confidence and reduces execution risk.
The engineering design is standardized to support replication across future clusters.
Each new cluster will:
Follow the same layout template
Use the same equipment specifications
Apply identical performance benchmarks
Incorporate optional legume add-on modules
This reduces:
Engineering risk
Design cost
Procurement lead time
Learning curve inefficiency
Over time, cluster replication improves capital efficiency and execution speed.
The Fixed-Price Turnkey model mitigates:
Cost overrun risk
Scope creep risk
Integration failure risk
Performance uncertainty
Independent technical oversight further reduces:
Equipment mismatch risk
Underperformance risk
Construction delay risk
This engineering governance model supports project finance participation and institutional capital deployment.
Jasminex does not pursue infrastructure expansion through incremental equipment accumulation.
It deploys a structured, standardized, and performance-guaranteed engineering model capable of disciplined national replication.
The integration of rice processing and legume rotation infrastructure reinforces the platform’s resilience, soil sustainability, and ESG credibility.
Cluster (Module) #1 serves as the engineering validation platform for future provincial expansion.